Minority institution rights not above law or absolute: SC rules on CMC-NEET


Written by Ananthakrishnan G
| New Delhi |

Published: April 30, 2020 4:39:32 am

 Neet exams, Neet exam 2020, NEET PG test CMC Vellore, CMC Vellore NEET, Supreme Court on NEET exam The petitioners had mentioned that unaided minority skilled schools have the basic proper to decide on the strategy and method of admitting college students

Stating that rights of non secular or linguistic minorities to manage an institution below Article 30 of the Constitution “are not above the law and other Constitutional provisions”, the Supreme Court dominated Wednesday that the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) for admission to graduate and post-graduate medical and dental programs is “regulatory” in nature and in “national interest” to enhance the standard of medical schooling which, it mentioned, has change into a “saleable commodity”.

Disposing a bunch of petitions by the Christian Medical College, Vellore, and others, the bench of Justices Arun Mishra, Vineet Saran and M R Shah ordered that NEET would be the solely examination for admission to the programs and establishments can’t be allowed to conduct their very own separate exams over and above NEET.

“We are of the opinion that rights under Articles 19 (1) (g) and 30 read with Articles 25, 26 and 29 (1) of the Constitution of India do not come in the way of securing transparency and recognition of merits in the matter of admissions. It is open to regulating the course of study, qualifications for ensuring educational standards. It is open to imposing reasonable restrictions in the national and public interest,” the bench mentioned.

Article 19 (1) (g) grants residents the precise to follow any occupation, or to hold on any occupation, commerce or enterprise whereas Article 30 pertains to the precise of minorities to determine and administer academic establishments.

“The rights to administer an institution under Article 30 of the Constitution are not above the law and other Constitutional provisions. Reasonable regulatory measures can be provided without violating such rights available under Article 30 of the Constitution to administer an institution,” the bench dominated.

Writing for the bench, Justice Mishra mentioned “the rights under Article 19(1) (g) are not absolute and are subject to reasonable restriction in the interest of the student’s community to promote merit, recognition of excellence, and to curb the malpractices. Uniform Entrance Test qualifies the test of proportionality and is reasonable. The same is intended to check several maladies which crept into medical education, to prevent capitation fee by admitting students which are lower in merit and to prevent exploitation, profiteering and commercialisation of education. The institution has to be a capable vehicle of education”.

“The minority institutions are equally bound to comply with the conditions imposed under the relevant Acts and Regulations to enjoy affiliation and recognition, which apply to all institutions. In case they have to impart education, they are bound to comply with the conditions which are equally applicable to all. The regulations are necessary, and they are not divisive or disintegrative. Such regulatory measures enable institutions to administer them efficiently… The quality of medical education is imperative to sub­serve the national interest, and merit cannot be compromised. The Government has the right for providing regulatory measures that are in the national interest,” the order acknowledged.

The petitioners had mentioned that unaided minority skilled schools have the basic proper to decide on the strategy and method of admitting college students, topic to satisfaction of the triple take a look at of a good, clear, and non­-exploitative course of, and that NEET might not be the one parameter to find out the benefit of a pupil.

They claimed that change within the admission process of scholars would end in a pointy decline within the present requirements of excellence maintained on the establishments and that this is able to not be in public curiosity.

Declining permission to conduct different exams, the bench mentioned “the system is not yet out of clutches of unscrupulous devices and dubious means are adopted to defeat merit. The interest of education would further suffer and very purpose of centralised examination would be defeated”.

“Building the nation is the main aspect of education, which could not be ignored and overlooked. They have to cater to national interest first, then their interest, more so, when such conditions can be prescribed for recognition, particularly in the matter of professional education,” the bench mentioned.

📣 The Indian Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@indianexpress) and keep up to date with the newest headlines

For all the newest Education News, obtain Indian Express App.

© The Indian Express (P) Ltd



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here